
The economic and environmental practices of most resident of the ward/SOA that I live in comply with the definition of sustainable community. About 75% of the overall population is economically active. This is in line with the national average of people who are contributing to the administration of the country. Many of the residents work in the government departments responsible for sustainable issues.
There is however other issues that the Area does not measure as well as the rest of the country. For instance there is no hostel to provide temporary social accommodation to those in need. This compared about 1,677 hostels in the south east of England. The ward also does not have a nursing home to provide accommodation for the elderly. It means therefore that residents will have to travel away from the ward in order to find a nursing home.
There isn’t sufficient public transportation in the ward. Only 60.28% of the population uses public transport. The remaining 39.72% depend on their own transportation. Government departments responsible for issues around sustainability encourage more use of public transport in order to help reduce population and be able to meet targets for carbon emission. However the absence of public transport will make it difficult for residents of the ward to embrace the campaign over these issues. This is evidence in the quality of air in the ward whereby in 2004 it was 1.10, and rose to 1.11.

